Malik v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm'n

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION CUMBERLAND, ss. . DOCKET NO. AP 03-11 JS

wo. biome PR PD,

4,

ROBERT P. MALIK,

Petitioner AUG 11 9003 Vv. ORDER STATE OF MAI Cumberland, SS, Clark's Office ~a. + SUPERIOR CQURT MAINE UNEMPLOYMENT JUL 31 2093 INSURANCE COMMISSION & ANDERSON WATKINS INSURANCE COMPANY, . RECEIVED Respondents

The record shows that Petitioner Malik failed to file a timely appeal from an adverse decision of the Division of Administrative Appeals to the Unempluyment Insurance Commission. « Therefore, this court shall dismiss

Petitioner Malik’s present appeal. McKenzie v. Maine Unemployment Sec.

Comm’‘n., 453 A.2d 505, 509 (Me. 1982) (“The specific periods of appeal statutorily affixed to the several steps in the chain of administrative review are

jurisdictional and mandatory.”).

Dated: July_3(_, 2003

Roland A. Cole Justice, Superior Court rue. cna 02/06/03 Cumberland oan NE AP-03-11 aie £licu LIOCKEL UND, County Action 80C Appeal ROBERT P. MALIK STATE OF MAINE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION ANDERSON-WATKINS INSURANCE VS. Plaintiff's Attorney Defendant’s Attorney PRO SE Elizabeth J. Wyman 286 Woodford Street, Apt. l Pamela W. Waite Portland, ME 04103 Assistant Attorneys General

6 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0006

Stephen P. St. Angelo (Anderson-Watkins In 31 Central Street

Westbrook, Maine 04092

Tate af