Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs. Read the opinion of the Court — 465 Fed. Appx. 942
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 9, 2011·No. 2011-7201·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

(flatten étatefi @1111 of gppeals for the feberaI Qtimn't

RASHID EL MALIK, Claimant-Appellant,

V.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

2011-7201

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in case no. 11-2110, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Rashid E1 Malik moves for leave to file a response to the respondent’s informal brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted to the extent that the court treats El Malik’s motion as his reply brief.

EL MALIK v. DVA 2 FOR THE COURT

M ls/ Jan Herbal Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Rashid El Malik Steven M. Mager, Esq. 521 m couafh%§%’pm ma THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEC 09 2011 JAN HQRBALY

CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs (Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.