Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
(flatten étatefi @1111 of gppeals for the feberaI Qtimn't
RASHID EL MALIK, Claimant-Appellant,
V.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.
2011-7201
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in case no. 11-2110, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Rashid E1 Malik moves for leave to file a response to the respondent’s informal brief.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted to the extent that the court treats El Malik’s motion as his reply brief.
EL MALIK v. DVA 2 FOR THE COURT
M ls/ Jan Herbal Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Rashid El Malik Steven M. Mager, Esq. 521 m couafh%§%’pm ma THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEC 09 2011 JAN HQRBALY
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs (Malik v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.