Malik Green v. State of Florida
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
MALIK GREEN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D14-2617
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed October 15, 2015.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David A. Henson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kristen Bonjour, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The state properly concedes that appellant could not be sentenced to ten
years of drug offender probation because he was not eligible to receive drug
offender probation in this case. See § 948.20(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of drug offender probation and remand with directions
that the trial court resentence appellant without imposing drug offender probation.
We otherwise affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence without comment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
ROBERTS, C.J. and LEWIS, J., CONCUR; BENTON, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.
I respectfully dissent. I would reverse appellant’s convictions on grounds
the objection to Detective Lormil’s testimony as to what the victim’s body
language communicated should have been sustained. Although I would not,
therefore, reach the sentencing issue decided by the majority, I have no quarrel
with the panel’s disposition of that issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malik Green v. State of Florida (Malik Green v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.