Malik El v. Ronald Freeman

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 19, 2019
DocketA19A2140
StatusPublished

This text of Malik El v. Ronald Freeman (Malik El v. Ronald Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malik El v. Ronald Freeman, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 14, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2140, A19A2141, A19A2142. MALIK EL v. RONALD FREEMAN et al.

In two separate cases, the Union City Municipal Court found Malik El guilty of building without a permit and having vehicles with expired tags. El filed two petitions for writ of certiorari and a direct appeal in the superior court challenging these rulings. The superior court entered separate orders dismissing each action, and El has appealed directly to this Court. In Case No. A19A2140, he appeals from the superior court’s dismissal of his direct appeal in the building permit case. In Case No. A19A2141, he appeals from the superior court’s dismissal of his certiorari petition in the expired tag case. And in Case No. A19A2142, he appeals from the superior court’s dismissal of his certiorari petition in the building permit case. We, however, lack jurisdiction to hear these appeals. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), “[a]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings” must be made by filing an application for discretionary appeal in this Court. See Consolidated Govt. of Columbus v. Barwick, 274 Ga. 176, 177 (1) (549 SE2d 73) (2001). Such compliance is required even where the superior court dismisses the action. See Brewer v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Atlanta, 170 Ga. App. 351 (317 SE2d 327) (1984). Because El failed to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure, we lack jurisdiction over these appeals. See id. Accordingly, these appeals are hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/14/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF ATLANTA
317 S.E.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Consolidated Government of Columbus v. Barwick
549 S.E.2d 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Malik El v. Ronald Freeman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malik-el-v-ronald-freeman-gactapp-2019.