Maliades v. Maliades

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maliades v. Maliades

17 A.D.2d 994, 234 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 A.D.2d 994 (Maliades v. Maliades) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maliades v. Maliades, 17 A.D.2d 994, 234 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding in the Family Court to compel support, the husband, pursuant to section 1012 of the new Family Court Act (L. 1962, ch. 686), moves for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Family Court, County of Queens, made October 5, 1962, which denied his motion to vacate prior support orders on the ground that in the interim the marriage between the parties had been dissolved by the entry of a divorce decree in the State of Florida. Section 1012 of the Family Court Act permits an appeal to this court as a matter of right from “ any order of disposition ” made under the act; and the section permits an appeal in the discretion of the Appellate Division from “ any other order ” under the act. Section 1018 of the act makes applicable the provisions of the Civil Practice Act and the Rules of Civil Practice to appeals from orders made in the Family Court. Following the established practice under the Civil Practice Act, it is our opinion that an order of disposition is one which affects a substantial right of the person aggrieved; such an order is appealable as of right. The order here is such an order. The motion for leave to appeal is therefore denied as unnecessary. It should be noted that, prior to the making of this motion, the husband already had served his notice of appeal—■ apparently as of right. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding in the Family Court to compel support, the husband, pursuant to section 1012 of the new Family Court Act (L. 1962, ch. 686), moves for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Family Court, County of Queens, made October 5, 1962, which denied his motion to vacate prior support orders on the ground that in the interim the marriage between the parties had been dissolved by the entry of a divorce decree in the State of Florida. Section 1012 of the Family Court Act permits an appeal to this court as a matter of right from “ any order of disposition ” made under the act; and the section permits an appeal in the discretion of the Appellate Division from “ any other order ” under the act. Section 1018 of the act makes applicable the provisions of the Civil Practice Act and the Rules of Civil Practice to appeals from orders made in the Family Court. Following the established practice under the Civil Practice Act, it is our opinion that an order of disposition is one which affects a substantial right of the person aggrieved; such an order is appealable as of right. The order here is such an order. The motion for leave to appeal is therefore denied as unnecessary. It should be noted that, prior to the making of this motion, the husband already had served his notice of appeal—■ apparently as of right. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 994, 234 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maliades-v-maliades-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack