Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark (WAL) Condominium Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark (WAL) Condominium Ass'n

172 F. App'x 522

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2006·No. 05-2154·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim of wrongful termination and granting summary judgment to Defendant on his claim that his Flexible Spending Account funds were being withheld. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See (R. Vol. 2 at 2-7); Malhotra v. Watergate at Land Condo Assoc., No. CA-05-76-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13, 2005 and entered Sept. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim of wrongful termination and granting summary judgment to Defendant on his claim that his Flexible Spending Account funds were being withheld. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See (R. Vol. 2 at 2-7); Malhotra v. Watergate at Land Condo Assoc., No. CA-05-76-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13, 2005 and entered Sept. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark (WAL) Condominium Ass'n, 172 F. App'x 522 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 522 (Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark (WAL) Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.