Malekmarzban v. Malekmarzban

670 So. 2d 1175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3336, 1996 WL 148865
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1996
DocketNo. 94-2925
StatusPublished

This text of 670 So. 2d 1175 (Malekmarzban v. Malekmarzban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malekmarzban v. Malekmarzban, 670 So. 2d 1175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3336, 1996 WL 148865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The award of permanent alimony is vacated as unjustified by the record, see Kellerman v. Kellerman, 659 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), and the cause is remanded for consideration — either, in the trial court’s discretion, with or without additional evidence— of making a rehabilitative award. No other error has been demonstrated in the judgment of dissolution below.

[1176]*1176Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kellerman v. Kellerman
659 So. 2d 1390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 1175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3336, 1996 WL 148865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malekmarzban-v-malekmarzban-fladistctapp-1996.