Malek v. Malek

107 A.D.3d 425, 965 N.Y.S.2d 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered March 1, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, and directed plaintiff to serve a formal complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiff made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, defendant’s affidavit successfully raised issues of fact concerning the validity of the promissory note based on the defenses of coercion and economic duress.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments, including his contention that defendant ratified the note by making payments under it, and find them unavailing. Concur— Gonzalez, RJ., Sweeny, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malek v. Malek, 107 A.D.3d 425, 965 N.Y.S.2d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

107 A.D.3d 425 (Malek v. Malek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katz v. Miller
120 A.D.3d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)