Malek v. Malek
This text of 107 A.D.3d 425 (Malek v. Malek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered March 1, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, and directed plaintiff to serve a formal complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Although plaintiff made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, defendant’s affidavit successfully raised issues of fact concerning the validity of the promissory note based on the defenses of coercion and economic duress.
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments, including his contention that defendant ratified the note by making payments under it, and find them unavailing. Concur— Gonzalez, RJ., Sweeny, Richter and Clark, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.3d 425, 965 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malek-v-malek-nyappdiv-2013.