Malek v. Bright
7 So. 3d 598, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2511, 2009 WL 763491
Opinion
Upon further review of the jurisdictional questions promulgated by this Court to the parties sua sponte in this case, we treat the appeal in this case as one taken from nonfinal orders which determine the right to immediate possession of property under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii). See Greene v. Borsky, 961 So.2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (stating that a sum of money is property to which Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) applies). We affirm the orders under review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malek v. Bright, 7 So. 3d 598, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2511, 2009 WL 763491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
7 So. 3d 598 (Malek v. Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
All Seasons Condo Assoc. v. Patrician Hotel
274 So. 3d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Higgins v. Ryan
81 So. 3d 588 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
TRG-Brickell Point NE, Ltd. v. Wajsblat
34 So. 3d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
TERRA-ADI INTERNATIONAL BAYSHORE, LLC. v. Georgarious
20 So. 3d 987 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)