Malec v. Halter

216 So. 2d 782
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1968·No. No. 68-422·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant [plaintiff in the trial court] seeks review of a favorable jury verdict, contending that the trial judge committed error when he refused to permit medical bills [incurred as a result of an alleged accident] to be introduced by the plaintiff, who was a married woman.

At common law, the prevailing party plaintiff could not seek review of a favorable verdict. This has been modified in this State by judicial rulings. Paul v. Kanter, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 402; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 10. A condition permitting a plaintiff [recovering a favorable verdict] to seek appellate review is that a motion for new trial be addressed to the trial court urging inadequacy of the verdict. Guarria v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 5; Paul v. Kanter, supra. This was not done in the instant case and, therefore, we do not disturb the verdict and final judgment here under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malec v. Halter, 216 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

216 So. 2d 782 (Malec v. Halter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vega v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance
336 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Morrison v. Bohne
274 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
O'Leary v. Watson
263 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)