Maldonado v. State
646 So. 2d 852, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12586, 1994 WL 715206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maldonado v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 634 So. 2d 661 →
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s convictions for armed robbery, armed burglary, and armed kidnapping, see Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980); State v. Freber, 366 So.2d 426 (Fla.1978); Scott v. State, 629 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), but, as the state concedes, we find error in sentencing the appellant as an habitual offender. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). Therefore, we vacate the sentences and return the matter to the trial court for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maldonado v. State, 646 So. 2d 852, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12586, 1994 WL 715206 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
646 So. 2d 852 (Maldonado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manson v. Brathwaite
432 U.S. 98 (Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Freber
366 So. 2d 426 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Scott v. State
629 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Lamont v. State
610 So. 2d 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Grant v. State
390 So. 2d 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)