Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maldonado v. Rojas

Maldonado v. Rojas

111 So. 3d 919, 2013 WL 856738, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2013
DocketNo. 2D11-4320
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 3d 919 (Maldonado v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maldonado v. Rojas, 111 So. 3d 919, 2013 WL 856738, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See C.W. Kistler Co. v. Hotel Martinique, 44 So.2d 288 (Fla.1950); Schlosser v. Perez, 832 So.2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Trout v. Apicella, 78 So.3d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and VILLANTI1 JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlosser v. Perez
832 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Trout v. Apicella
78 So. 3d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 3d 919, 2013 WL 856738, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-rojas-fladistctapp-2013.