Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maldonado v. Rojas

Maldonado v. Rojas

111 So. 3d 919, 2013 WL 856738, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maldonado v. Rojas. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10021 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2013·No. No. 2D11-4320·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See C.W. Kistler Co. v. Hotel Martinique, 44 So.2d 288 (Fla.1950); Schlosser v. Perez, 832 So.2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Trout v. Apicella, 78 So.3d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and VILLANTI1 JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maldonado v. Rojas, 111 So. 3d 919, 2013 WL 856738, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

111 So. 3d 919 (Maldonado v. Rojas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schlosser v. Perez
832 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Trout v. Apicella
78 So. 3d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)