Maldonado v. Moore

135 A.D.2d 1138, 523 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53008
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and summary judgment granted to defendants dismissing complaint. Memorandum: The court erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiffs. Instead, summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted to defendants. Defendants had agreed to purchase real property from plaintiffs. The contract provided that, if the purchasers were unable to obtain a mortgage commitment by November 20, 1985, either party could cancel in writing without further liability, and it prohibited oral modification. It is uncontroverted that no mortgage commitment was obtained by that date. Defendants properly exercised their right to cancel by a writing received by the sellers on or about February 2,1986 even though a mortgage commitment had been issued on January 17, 1986 (see, Sainato v Hormozdi, 87 AD2d 625; Stotz v Cleveland, 53 AD2d 787). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Tillman, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maldonado v. Moore, 135 A.D.2d 1138, 523 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

135 A.D.2d 1138 (Maldonado v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Leger
288 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Anderson v. Krupp
199 A.D.2d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)