Maldonado v. Miller

254 A.D.2d 660, 679 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11493
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 29, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 660 (Maldonado v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maldonado v. Miller, 254 A.D.2d 660, 679 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits inmates from fighting after he and another inmate were involved in a brawl. Petitioner contends that he was denied the right to present relevant documentary evidence and was not provided with a written denial of his request for a copy of the misbehavior report of the other inmate involved. We find that any error in the Hearing Officer’s denial of petitioner’s request for the other inmate’s misbehavior report is harmless (see, Matter of Giakoumelos v Coughlin, 198 AD2d 744, 745), particularly where petitioner had the opportunity to question the correction officer who witnessed the fight and authored both misbehavior reports. Moreover, petitioner’s , claim that he was acting in self-defense merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Mata v Goord, 250 AD2d 907). Given the testimony presented at the hearing, together with the misbehavior report, we find substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt.

Mercure, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connell v. Goord
298 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Maldonado v. Selsky
257 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 660, 679 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-miller-nyappdiv-1998.