Maldonado v. City of Fresno

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 MARISSA MALDONADO, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00102-SAB

11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO TERMINATE ANTHONY JEFF 12 v. AND ALICE VALENZUELA AS PARTIES IN THIS ACTION 13 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF No. 12) 14 Defendants.

15 16 On April 26, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal of Defendants Anthony Jeff and 17 Alice Valenzuela pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. 12.) 18 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the 19 defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 20 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 21 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through 22 a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”). 23 Defendants Anthony Jeff and Alice Valenzuela have not filed answers or motions for 24 summary judgment in this action. Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) a “plaintiff may dismiss an action 25 without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an 26 answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 27 Plaintiffs do not indicate whether dismissal is with prejudice. Defendants Anthony Jeff and Alice Valenzuela are therefore dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(B). 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Anthony Jeff 2 | and Alice Valenzuela as defendants in this action. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 Dated: _ May 2, 2024

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28