Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.

68 A.D.3d 531, 889 N.Y.2d 454

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 531 (Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co., 68 A.D.3d 531, 889 N.Y.2d 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant’s discovery motion (see Simpson v [532]*532Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant’s discovery motion (see Simpson v [532]*532Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.3d 531, 889 N.Y.2d 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-algil-holding-co-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack