Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.
68 A.D.3d 531, 889 N.Y.2d 454
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2009·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse by showing that his default resulted from law office failure to calendar and timely oppose defendant’s discovery motion (see Simpson v [532]*532Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc., 48 AD3d 389, 392 [2008]), and also demonstrated merit to his cause (see Palermo v Lord & Taylor, 287 AD2d 258, 260 [2001]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co., 68 A.D.3d 531, 889 N.Y.2d 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 531 (Maldonado v. Algil Holding Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willner v. S Norsel Realties LLC
2022 NY Slip Op 04111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Castellano v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 06536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)