Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp.

23 A.D.3d 177, 802 N.Y.S.2d 621
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered April 16, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Even if defendant landowner complied with the applicable statutes and regulations, that circumstance would not, under the facts at bar, be dispositive of whether defendant discharged its common-law duty to maintain its premises in reasonably safe condition (see Kellman v 45 Tiemann Assoc., 87 NY2d 871 [1995] ; Swerdlow v WSK Props. Corp., 5 AD3d 587 [2004]). On the present record, a factfinder could infer that plaintiff’s fall and injury were attributable to irregular, unrailed, or unlit building entry stairs. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp., 23 A.D.3d 177, 802 N.Y.S.2d 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 177 (Maldonado v. 1992 Fulton Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donaldson v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
2025 NY Slip Op 02719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Kimen v. False Alarm, Ltd.
69 A.D.3d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)