Maldonado and Company v. . Espen

New York Court of Appeals

Maldonado and Company v. . Espen

88 N.E. 14, 195 N.Y. 541, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1109

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 1909·Published

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

The contract sued upon was established by the letters between the parties. Much of the evidence of prior conversations, upon the subject of an order for the merchandise, was immaterial and should have been excluded. As we cannot see, however, that the defendants suffered any prejudice from the admission of that evidence, and as it does not vary the obligations of the contract, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ouriam.

The contract sued upon was established by the letters between the parties. Much of the evidence of prior conversations, upon the subject of an order for the merchandise, was immaterial and should have been excluded. As we cannot see, however, that the defendants suffered any prejudice from the admission of that evidence, and as it does not vary the obligations of the contract, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Maldonado and Company v. . Espen, 88 N.E. 14, 195 N.Y. 541, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1109 (N.Y. 1909).

Pincite

88 N.E. 14 (Maldonado and Company v. . Espen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.