Malcolm v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Malcolm v. State

231 S.E.2d 141, 140 Ga. App. 407, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1498

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1976·No. 53087·Published

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault with intent to rape based upon a jury’s verdict of guilty.

1. We have considered the evidence and find it sufficient to support the verdict of guilty.

2. There is no merit in defendant’s other enumeration of error as to admissibility of the testimony of the two officers relating to defendant’s admissions which were voluntary and uncoerced.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur. M. Randall Peek, District Attorney, Alton G. Hartley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault with intent to rape based upon a jury’s verdict of guilty.

1. We have considered the evidence and find it sufficient to support the verdict of guilty.

2. There is no merit in defendant’s other enumeration of error as to admissibility of the testimony of the two officers relating to defendant’s admissions which were voluntary and uncoerced.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur. M. Randall Peek, District Attorney, Alton G. Hartley, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Malcolm v. State, 231 S.E.2d 141, 140 Ga. App. 407, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1498 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

231 S.E.2d 141 (Malcolm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.