Malcolm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Malcolm v. State

34 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265, 2010 WL 1563176

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 2010·No. 3D09-2891·Published

Opinion

On Order to Show Cause

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order to show cause directing Mr. Malcolm to demonstrate why he should not be barred from filing further appeals in Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court case numbers 96-19774 and 03-30598. Having considered Mr. Malcolm’s response, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings in case numbers 96-19774 and 03-30598. Any further pleadings regarding these cases will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Steele v. State, 14 So.3d 221 (Fla.2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Order to Show Cause

PER CURIAM.

This court issued an order to show cause directing Mr. Malcolm to demonstrate why he should not be barred from filing further appeals in Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court case numbers 96-19774 and 03-30598. Having considered Mr. Malcolm’s response, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings in case numbers 96-19774 and 03-30598. Any further pleadings regarding these cases will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Steele v. State, 14 So.3d 221 (Fla.2009).

Malcolm v. State, 34 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5265, 2010 WL 1563176 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

34 So. 3d 124 (Malcolm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related