Malcolm v. Gleason

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Malcolm v. Gleason

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 251

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1767

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 251 (Malcolm v. Gleason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malcolm v. Gleason, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 251 (Mass. 1767).

Pincite

Opinion

A. drew a negotiable Order upon B. accepted the Order, and after Acceptance the Order was indorsed over. The Question was, if the Indorsee could support an Action against B. (upon his Acceptance aforesaid upon the Preserment of the Order by the Payee) before personal Notice given B., of Indorsement.

Ruled, unanimously, by all the five Judges, on Argument, that the Action was well brought, and that Notice to B. of Indorsement was not necessary; for B. was liable to Indorsee in the same Manner that he was to Payee, on the Acceptance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. drew a negotiable Order upon B. accepted the Order, and after Acceptance the Order was indorsed over. The Question was, if the Indorsee could support an Action against B. (upon his Acceptance aforesaid upon the Preserment of the Order by the Payee) before personal Notice given B., of Indorsement.

Ruled, unanimously, by all the five Judges, on Argument, that the Action was well brought, and that Notice to B. of Indorsement was not necessary; for B. was liable to Indorsee in the same Manner that he was to Payee, on the Acceptance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malcolm-v-gleason-mass-1767.