Malcolm Realty Co. v. 21 East Twenty-first Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Malcolm Realty Co. v. 21 East Twenty-first Street Corp.

245 A.D. 731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 731 (Malcolm Realty Co. v. 21 East Twenty-first Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malcolm Realty Co. v. 21 East Twenty-first Street Corp., 245 A.D. 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The claim of the respondents that at the time the 21 East Twenty-first Street Corporation made its mortgage to plaintiff it no longer had title to the property in question, having conveyed the same two days prior thereto to one Olsen, cannot be sustained. Although the deed from it to Olsen is dated September 23,1931, it was not recorded until September 28,1931, and the presumption, therefore, is that the deed to Olsen was not delivered until the date it was recorded. (Ford v. Gale, 155 App. Div. 675.) Furthermore, the proof on the part of the plaintiff, that this deed was not delivered until September 28, 1931, is uncontradicted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The claim of the respondents that at the time the 21 East Twenty-first Street Corporation made its mortgage to plaintiff it no longer had title to the property in question, having conveyed the same two days prior thereto to one Olsen, cannot be sustained. Although the deed from it to Olsen is dated September 23,1931, it was not recorded until September 28,1931, and the presumption, therefore, is that the deed to Olsen was not delivered until the date it was recorded. (Ford v. Gale, 155 App. Div. 675.) Furthermore, the proof on the part of the plaintiff, that this deed was not delivered until September 28, 1931, is uncontradicted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malcolm-realty-co-v-21-east-twenty-first-street-corp-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack