Malchoff v. State

99 S.W.2d 917
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 16, 1936
DocketNo. 18649
StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.W.2d 917 (Malchoff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malchoff v. State, 99 S.W.2d 917 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the liquor laws of this state, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

Omitting the formal parts, the information reads as follows: “That one Mrs. John Malchoff did then and there unlawfully sell to L. E. Morris one pint of whiskey (Crab Orchard Brand) of liquor in a dry area, to-wit in the County of Coleman and State of Texas.”

The information fails to charge an offense under authority of the case of Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 742. See, also, Kelly v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 998, decided November 18, 1936, and Privitt v. State, (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 204, decided November 4, 1936 (but not yet reported [in State Reports]).

Therefore the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitmire v. State
94 S.W.2d 742 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Kelly v. State
98 S.W.2d 998 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Privitt v. State
98 S.W.2d 204 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.W.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malchoff-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.