Malbranche v. Art Hall Protection Services Inc.
This text of 258 F. App'x 259 (Malbranche v. Art Hall Protection Services Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district court, in an order entered on December 20, 2006, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, thus dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiffs now appeal, contending that the existence of genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment. They also contend that the court erred in granting summary judgment on the basis of accord and satisfaction, a defense not pled in defendants’ answer or preserved by the pretrial order.
The district court stated in its December 20 order that, given its summary disposition of plaintiffs’ claims, “it is unnecessary for this Court to address Accord and Satisfaction.” Plaintiffs’ argument that the court based its order on such defense therefore fails. As for the existence of material facts precluding summary judgment, we find none for the reasons stated by the district court in its December 20 order.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malbranche-v-art-hall-protection-services-inc-ca11-2007.