Malatesta v. Hopf
567 N.E.2d 977, 77 N.Y.2d 828, 566 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 71
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (163 AD2d 651).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Malatesta v. Hopf, 567 N.E.2d 977, 77 N.Y.2d 828, 566 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 71 (N.Y. 1991).
567 N.E.2d 977 (Malatesta v. Hopf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. Garrant
27 A.D.3d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Barnao v. Barnao
297 A.D.2d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Moore v. Bame
257 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Simpson v. Simpson
222 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Davey v. Ohler
188 A.D.2d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Dutcher v. Fetcher
183 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Healy v. Greco
174 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Goode v. Meyn
165 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)