Malanchuk v. Sivchuk

115 A.3d 310, 631 Pa. 608
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 27, 2015
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 A.3d 310 (Malanchuk v. Sivchuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malanchuk v. Sivchuk, 115 A.3d 310, 631 Pa. 608 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court, en banc, err in quashing, as interlocutory, an appeal from an order granting summary judgment as to all claims and all defendants in one of two separate actions, consolidated under Pa.R.C.P. 213(a), where there was not a complete consolidation and merger of the actions?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.G. Samer v. F. Dashner, IV
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.3d 310, 631 Pa. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malanchuk-v-sivchuk-pa-2015.