Malaika Brooks v. City of Seattle

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 2010
Docket08-35526
StatusPublished

This text of Malaika Brooks v. City of Seattle (Malaika Brooks v. City of Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malaika Brooks v. City of Seattle, (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MALAIKA BROOKS,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant, and No. 08-35526

 STEVEN L. DAMAN, in his capacity D.C. No. as an officer of the Seattle Police 2:06-cv-01681-RAJ Department; DONALD M. JONES, in his individual capacity as an ORDER officer of the Seattle Police Department; JUAN M. ORNELAS, in his individual capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department, Defendants-Appellants.  Filed September 30, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Malaika Brooks v. City of Seattle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malaika-brooks-v-city-of-seattle-ca9-2010.