Malagodi v. Nice

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 2, 2024
DocketCAAP-24-0000017
StatusPublished

This text of Malagodi v. Nice (Malagodi v. Nice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Malagodi v. Nice, (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 02-FEB-2024 07:58 AM Dkt. 10 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

MARK MALAGODI and JANET JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, v. CAMERON E. NICE and MARTHA J. JACOBSEN, aka MARTHA J. JACOBSEN-NICE, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants, and AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B., a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that self-

represented Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants Cameron E.

Nice and Martha J. Jacobsen, AKA Martha J. Jacobsen-Nice (Nice

Parties) appeal from the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit's

November 1, 2022 "Order Approving Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary

Judgment Filed July 29, 2022" and February 7, 2023 "Order

Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Order Granting Plaintiffs'

Motion for Summary Judgment Filed Herein on December 13, 2022."

We conclude that the court lacks jurisdiction because the circuit

court has not yet entered a final, appealable judgment. See

Hawaii Revised Statutes § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming &

Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, February 2, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright
869 P.2d 1334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Malagodi v. Nice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malagodi-v-nice-hawapp-2024.