Malafsky v. Becker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Malafsky v. Becker

255 A.D. 444, 7 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 255 A.D. 444 (Malafsky v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Malafsky v. Becker, 255 A.D. 444, 7 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the respondent herein had filed his notice of lien he did not, within one year, commence an action to foreclose the lien, secure an order continuing the lien, or become a party defendant in an action to enforce another hen. Accordingly, his lien expired under the terms of the applicable statutes. (Lien Law, §§ 17, 19.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI