Malafsky v. Becker

255 A.D. 444, 7 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1938·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After the respondent herein had filed his notice of lien he did not, within one year, commence an action to foreclose the lien, secure an order continuing the lien, or become a party defendant in an action to enforce another hen. Accordingly, his lien expired under the terms of the applicable statutes. (Lien Law, §§ 17, 19.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Malafsky v. Becker, 255 A.D. 444, 7 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 444 (Malafsky v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lex 54 Condominium v. Eltech Indus., Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 32901(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
170 W. End Ave. Owners Corp. v. Centennial El. Indus., Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 33920(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Leven Betts, Ltd. v. Mack
102 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Cook v. Carmen S. Pariso, Inc.
287 A.D.2d 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Bernardo v. Steelco, Division of Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc.
115 Misc. 2d 1020 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Jericho Jewish Center v. Hibner
28 Misc. 2d 458 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Charkin v. Premises Known as 2204 New Haven Avenue
180 Misc. 604 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)