Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 20, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-03933·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MAKINA VE KIMYA ENDUSTRISI A:S., Plaintiff, -against- 22-cv-3933 (AS) ORDER A.S.A.P. LOGISTICS LTD, et al., Defendants.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: In support of their pending dispositive motions, the parties filed motions to seal or redact documents that contain confidential, commercially sensitive, and previously undisclosed financial, marketing, or business material. After reviewing the documents and applying the three-part test described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), the Court finds that sealing or redaction 1s warranted. So the applications are all granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkts. 170, 191, 193, 210, and 217.

SO ORDERED. Dated: June 20, 2024 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRA ANIAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD (Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)