Maki v. Autonation, Inc.
895 So. 2d 453, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 964, 2005 WL 236439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 4D04-3722·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The trial court granted AutoNation’s motion for temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement signed by appellant, an employee. We find no abuse of discretion in the enforcement of the non-compete agreement, which prohibited appellant from competing against AutoNation within fifty miles of the location where he was employed, or within ten miles of any other AutoNation dealer, for a one year period. We accordingly affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maki v. Autonation, Inc., 895 So. 2d 453, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 964, 2005 WL 236439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
895 So. 2d 453 (Maki v. Autonation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Llerana v. Autonation, Inc.
25 So. 3d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Wagner v. State
895 So. 2d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)