Makarova v. Stevens

237 A.D.2d 224, 655 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2930
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 224 (Makarova v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Makarova v. Stevens, 237 A.D.2d 224, 655 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila AbdusSalaam, J.), entered October 16, 1996, which deemed defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment as one to renew their prior motion for summary judgment, and, so [225]*225considered, denied the motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ second, eve-of-trial motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The papers submitted demonstrate the existence of questions of fact as to the degree of control exercised by either or both defendants. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Makarova v. Silverstein
295 A.D.2d 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D.2d 224, 655 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/makarova-v-stevens-nyappdiv-1997.