Makara v. Makara
This text of 925 N.E.2d 96 (Makara v. Makara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the portion of the September 2009 Appellate Division order that affirmed the imposition of sanctions against appellants and the grant of a counsel fee award to nonparty Shayo, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the September 2009 Appellate Division order and the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, do not *766 finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
925 N.E.2d 96, 14 N.Y.3d 765, 2010 NY Slip Op 63886, 898 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/makara-v-makara-ny-2010.