Makara v. Makara

New York Court of Appeals

Makara v. Makara

925 N.E.2d 96, 14 N.Y.3d 765, 2010 NY Slip Op 63886, 898 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 43

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the portion of the September 2009 Appellate Division order that affirmed the imposition of sanctions against appellants and the grant of a counsel fee award to nonparty Shayo, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the September 2009 Appellate Division order and the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, do not *766 finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the portion of the September 2009 Appellate Division order that affirmed the imposition of sanctions against appellants and the grant of a counsel fee award to nonparty Shayo, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the September 2009 Appellate Division order and the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, do not *766 finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Makara v. Makara, 925 N.E.2d 96, 14 N.Y.3d 765, 2010 NY Slip Op 63886, 898 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 43 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

925 N.E.2d 96 (Makara v. Makara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.