Majunique Brown v. Reubart, et al.
Opinion
2 3 6 kok 7 MAJUNIQUE BROWN, 8 Petitioner, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02318-RFB-MDC 9 v. ORDER REUBART, er al., 11 Respondents. 12 13 Before the Court is Petitioner Majunique Brown’s motion for a stay in which she explains that her initial state post-conviction proceedings are still ongoing (ECF No. 14 (citing Pace v. 15 DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 416-17 (2005))). Respondents have filed a non-opposition to the 16 motion (ECF No. 15). The Court finds that a stay is appropriate under the circumstances of this 17 case. 18 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for a stay (ECF No. 14) is 19 GRANTED. Petitioner must move to reopen this action within 45 days of the issuance of the 20 remittitur by the Nevada Supreme Court at the conclusion of her state court proceedings. 21 IT IS FURTHER KINDLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court stay and administratively 22 close this action. 23 amin 24 DATED: December 22, 2025.
26 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Majunique Brown v. Reubart, et al. (Majunique Brown v. Reubart, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.