Majors v. State
451 So. 2d 536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13574
Opinion
In this appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief, we hold that the language in the motion,
The prosecution withheld the name and address of a material witness; “The man with the shotgun” who would have testified favorably for the defense and could have verified the defendant’s demeanor as it was that day at the scene of the robbery and alleged conspiracy,
does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The other issues raised on appeal are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Majors v. State, 451 So. 2d 536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
451 So. 2d 536 (Majors v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Golden v. State
509 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Jenkins v. State
479 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)