Majors v. State
451 So. 2d 536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13574
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1984
DocketNo. AX-430
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 451 So. 2d 536 (Majors v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Majors v. State, 451 So. 2d 536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
In this appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief, we hold that the language in the motion,
The prosecution withheld the name and address of a material witness; “The man with the shotgun” who would have testified favorably for the defense and could have verified the defendant’s demeanor as it was that day at the scene of the robbery and alleged conspiracy,
does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The other issues raised on appeal are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Golden v. State
509 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Jenkins v. State
479 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
451 So. 2d 536, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majors-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.