Major v. Raymond

Fourth Circuit

Major v. Raymond

522 F. App'x 186

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 4, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2457

StatusPublished

This text of 522 F. App'x 186 (Major v. Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Major v. Raymond, 522 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Major, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint, and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Major v. Raymond, No. 6:12-cv-00183-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2012; Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Major, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil complaint, and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Major v. Raymond, No. 6:12-cv-00183-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2012; Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/major-v-raymond-ca4-2013.