Major v. Major

277 A.D.2d 1016, 716 N.Y.S.2d 222, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11445

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1016 (Major v. Major) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Major v. Major, 277 A.D.2d 1016, 716 N.Y.S.2d 222, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In light of the ability of each party to bear his or her own legal and experts’ fees, and given defendant’s prior contribution of $7,500 toward such fees incurred by plaintiff, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the application to require defendant to pay plaintiffs outstanding legal and expert fees (see, Kamerman v Kamerman, 269 AD2d 165; Nielsen v Nielsen, 256 AD2d 1173; Goddard v Goddard, 256 AD2d 545, 547; Matter of Whittaker v Feldman, 113 AD2d 809, 812). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whittaker v. Feldman
113 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Goddard v. Goddard
256 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Nielsen v. Nielsen
256 A.D.2d 1173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Kamerman v. Kamerman
269 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 1016, 716 N.Y.S.2d 222, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/major-v-major-nyappdiv-2000.