Major v. Heller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Major v. Heller

80 So. 3d 442, 2012 WL 555430, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2667

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-3753

StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 3d 442 (Major v. Heller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Major v. Heller, 80 So. 3d 442, 2012 WL 555430, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2667 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sergeant Kim Major petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari following the circuit court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment based upon sovereign immunity grounds under section 768.29(9)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). We dismiss the petition. See Dep’t of Educ. v. Roe, 679 So.2d 756 (Fla.1996); TBE Group, Inc. v. Banerjee, 82 So.3d 1024, 2011 WL 3586189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

We note that the Supreme Court of Florida has accepted discretionary jurisdiction of Keck v. Eminisor, 46 So.3d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), rev. granted, 54 So.3d 973 (Fla.2010). As in TBE Group, Inc., we certify a question of great public importance:

Whether review of the denial of a motion for summary judgment, based on a claim of immunity as an agent of the state under section 768.28(9)(a) & 10(e), without implicating the discretionary functions of public officials, should await the entry of a final judgment in the trial court?

Dismissed; question certified.

POLEN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI