Major v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Major v. Director of Revenue

193 S.W.3d 793, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 837, 2006 WL 1601852

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2006·No. No. ED 86148·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Howard Major (“Major”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for review after re-trial on remand, and sustaining the suspension of his driving privüeges. Major claims the trial court lacked jurisdiction and the judgment was precluded by res judicata.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Howard Major (“Major”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for review after re-trial on remand, and sustaining the suspension of his driving privüeges. Major claims the trial court lacked jurisdiction and the judgment was precluded by res judicata.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Major v. Director of Revenue, 193 S.W.3d 793, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 837, 2006 WL 1601852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

193 S.W.3d 793 (Major v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.