Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

Eleventh Circuit

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation

239 F.3d 1209

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 2001

Docket00-11047

StatusPublished

This text of 239 F.3d 1209 (Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Major Saxton, Jr. v. CSX Transportation, 239 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Major SAXTON, Jr., Mary Saxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-11047.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit. March 15, 2001.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 98-01719-CV-N-S); Edwin L. Nelson, Judge. (Opinion January 24, 2001, 239 F.3d 1209, 11th Cir., 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI