Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority

160 So. 2d 125
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1964
DocketNo. 4105
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 160 So. 2d 125 (Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 160 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Basically, the question at issue is whether a mortgagee of lands in a condemnation action is entitled to be awarded an attorney’s fee to be paid by the petitioner-condemnor. The trial judge answered this question in the negative. We are in accord with this determination. See the case of Shavers v. Duval County, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 684.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and REVELS, P. B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grieser v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation
371 So. 2d 164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Florida Department of Transportation v. Trost International, Ltd.
47 Fla. Supp. 175 (Lee County Circuit Court, 1978)
Dade County v. Priest
31 Fla. Supp. 134 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1968)
Dade County v. Mendoza, Inc.
28 Fla. Supp. 141 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 2d 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/major-realty-corp-v-florida-state-turnpike-authority-fladistctapp-1964.