Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority

160 So. 2d 125

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1964·No. No. 4105·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Basically, the question at issue is whether a mortgagee of lands in a condemnation action is entitled to be awarded an attorney’s fee to be paid by the petitioner-condemnor. The trial judge answered this question in the negative. We are in accord with this determination. See the case of Shavers v. Duval County, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 684.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and REVELS, P. B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Basically, the question at issue is whether a mortgagee of lands in a condemnation action is entitled to be awarded an attorney’s fee to be paid by the petitioner-condemnor. The trial judge answered this question in the negative. We are in accord with this determination. See the case of Shavers v. Duval County, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 684.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and REVELS, P. B., Associate Judge, concur.

Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 160 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

160 So. 2d 125 (Major Realty Corp. v. Florida State Turnpike Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related