Major Louis Ward, Jr. v. Don Falk Prison Enterprise North Carolina Department of Correction

Fourth Circuit

Major Louis Ward, Jr. v. Don Falk Prison Enterprise North Carolina Department of Correction

48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10981, 1995 WL 88921

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

Docket94-6881

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1218 (Major Louis Ward, Jr. v. Don Falk Prison Enterprise North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Major Louis Ward, Jr. v. Don Falk Prison Enterprise North Carolina Department of Correction, 48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10981, 1995 WL 88921 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Major Louis WARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Don FALK; Prison Enterprise; North Carolina Department of
Correction, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6881.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Major Louis Ward, Jr., Appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Falk, No. CA-94-44-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Major Louis WARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Don FALK; Prison Enterprise; North Carolina Department of
Correction, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6881.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Major Louis Ward, Jr., Appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Falk, No. CA-94-44-5-V (W.D.N.C. July 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10981, 1995 WL 88921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/major-louis-ward-jr-v-don-falk-prison-enterprise-n-ca4-1995.