Major Group of West Coast Florida, Inc. v. Cunningham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Major Group of West Coast Florida, Inc. v. Cunningham

452 So. 2d 1048, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13828

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1984·No. No. 83-2445·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the evidence in the record in this contract action we cannot agree with appellants’ cogent argument that there was no jury issue as to whether duress was established as a defense. See Cooper v. Cooper, 69 So.2d 881 (Fla.1954); City of Miami v. Kory, 394 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Corporacion Peruana de Auropuertos y Aviacion Commercial v. Boy, 180 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). We do not find merit in appellants’ remaining contentions.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the evidence in the record in this contract action we cannot agree with appellants’ cogent argument that there was no jury issue as to whether duress was established as a defense. See Cooper v. Cooper, 69 So.2d 881 (Fla.1954); City of Miami v. Kory, 394 So.2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Corporacion Peruana de Auropuertos y Aviacion Commercial v. Boy, 180 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). We do not find merit in appellants’ remaining contentions.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

Major Group of West Coast Florida, Inc. v. Cunningham, 452 So. 2d 1048, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13828 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

452 So. 2d 1048 (Major Group of West Coast Florida, Inc. v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related