Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Majka v. Rubino

Majka v. Rubino

48 A.D.2d 1002, 372 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 1002 (Majka v. Rubino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Majka v. Rubino, 48 A.D.2d 1002, 372 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to move upon a proper showing for an order vacating the default, if so advised. (See McNamara v Hutchinson, 33 AD2d 26; CPLR 3404.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term restoring action to Trial Calendar.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. Hutchinson
33 A.D.2d 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.2d 1002, 372 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majka-v-rubino-nyappdiv-1975.