Majka v. Rubino
48 A.D.2d 1002, 372 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to move upon a proper showing for an order vacating the default, if so advised. (See McNamara v Hutchinson, 33 AD2d 26; CPLR 3404.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term restoring action to Trial Calendar.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Majka v. Rubino, 48 A.D.2d 1002, 372 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).
48 A.D.2d 1002 (Majka v. Rubino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNamara v. Hutchinson
33 A.D.2d 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)