Majid v. Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Majid v. Commissioner of Social Services

244 A.D.2d 187, 664 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 187 (Majid v. Commissioner of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Majid v. Commissioner of Social Services, 244 A.D.2d 187, 664 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered on or about May 30, 1996, which dismissed the petition seeking to prevent respondent from collecting interest on a money judgment entered against petitioner in 1988, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The judgment representing arrears in child support is subject to postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003 and, as the IAS Court correctly found, such interest is not barred by the Hearing Examiner’s ruling that petitioner was not obligated to pay prejudgment interest. Further, petitioner’s payment of interest does not constitute payment of a “greater portion of such arrears” within the meaning of Family Court Act § 460 [188]*188(3). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered on or about May 30, 1996, which dismissed the petition seeking to prevent respondent from collecting interest on a money judgment entered against petitioner in 1988, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The judgment representing arrears in child support is subject to postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003 and, as the IAS Court correctly found, such interest is not barred by the Hearing Examiner’s ruling that petitioner was not obligated to pay prejudgment interest. Further, petitioner’s payment of interest does not constitute payment of a “greater portion of such arrears” within the meaning of Family Court Act § 460 [188]*188(3). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 187, 664 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majid-v-commissioner-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack