Majid v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Majid v. Brown

218 A.D.2d 802, 631 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 28, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D.2d 802 (Majid v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Majid v. Brown, 218 A.D.2d 802, 631 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

-—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to disclose certain documents pursuant to Public Officers Law § 84 et seq., the [803]*803petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), dated October 12,1993, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In October 1993, the respondent turned over those documents demanded which were in his possession. The sufficiency of that production of documents was determined in a subsequent proceeding by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from which no appeal was taken. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondent to disclose certain documents pursuant to Public Officers Law § 84 et seq., the [803]*803petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), dated October 12,1993, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In October 1993, the respondent turned over those documents demanded which were in his possession. The sufficiency of that production of documents was determined in a subsequent proceeding by a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, from which no appeal was taken. Accordingly, the instant appeal is academic. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 802, 631 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majid-v-brown-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack