Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 544
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 835 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 18, 1957·No. No. 60880; protests 158404-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinions
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Rung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266. C. D. 14801 or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 544 (cusc 1957).
38 Cust. Ct. 544 (Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)
Prime Fur Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 83 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)