Majestic Development Corp. v. Ferman

388 S.E.2d 701, 259 Ga. 859, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 76
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 1, 1990
DocketS90A0390
StatusPublished

This text of 388 S.E.2d 701 (Majestic Development Corp. v. Ferman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Majestic Development Corp. v. Ferman, 388 S.E.2d 701, 259 Ga. 859, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 76 (Ga. 1990).

Opinion

Weltner, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order finding Majestic Development Corporation in contempt for violating a temporary injunction. Earlier, Majestic had been enjoined from permitting water to flow onto the lands of Ferman in a greater volume, quantity, or concentration than its natural flow before the construction of Majestic’s subdivision.

All of the enumerations of error pertain to the propriety of the grant of the temporary injunction, from which there was no appeal.

A judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction shall be conclusive between the same parties and their privies as to all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered until the judgment is reversed or set aside. [OCGA § 9-12-40.]

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 9-12-40
Georgia § 9-12-40

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 S.E.2d 701, 259 Ga. 859, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majestic-development-corp-v-ferman-ga-1990.