MAJCO LLC v. JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an individual

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedDecember 9, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-01967
StatusUnknown

This text of MAJCO LLC v. JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an individual (MAJCO LLC v. JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an individual) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MAJCO LLC v. JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an individual, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 RYAN T. WAGGONER (BAR NO. 251694) ERIC C. PETTIS (BAR NO. 313492) 2 NATHAN T. JAMIESON (BAR NO. 333304) ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE 3 MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Phone: (213) 622-5555 5 Fax: (213) 620-8816 E-Mail: rwaggoner@allenmatkins.com 6 epettis@allenmatkins.com njamieson@allenmatkins.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 MAJCO LLC

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 MAJCO LLC, a California limited liability Case No. 2:25-cv-1967-DC-JDP company, 13 Judge Hon. Dena M. Coggins Plaintiff, 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California Complaint Filed: July 14, 2025 16 corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an FAC: October 14, 2025 individual; KURST BOVERO, an 17 individual; SIERRA TIRE CO., a California limited liability company; and DOES 1 18 through 10,

19 Defendants.

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or 3 private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 4 purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties 5 hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 6 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 7 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 8 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 9 treatment under the applicable legal principles. 10 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 11 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and other 12 valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary 13 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 14 purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 15 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial 16 information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential 17 research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating 18 privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or 19 which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal 20 statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 21 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery 22 materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to 23 ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in 24 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the 25 litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified 26 in this matter. 27 28 1 3. DEFINITIONS 2 3.1. Action: Majco LLC v. Jackson Tire Service, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-01967- 3 DC-JDP (E.D. Cal.) 4 3.2. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 5 information or items under this Order. 6 3.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it 7 is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 8 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 9 3.4. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 10 support staff). 11 3.5. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items 12 that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 13 3.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 14 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other 15 things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in 16 disclosures or responses to discovery. 17 3.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 18 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert 19 witness or as a consultant in this Action. 20 3.8. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House 21 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 22 3.9. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other 23 legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 24 3.10. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 25 Action but are retained to represent a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action 26 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that 27 party, and includes support staff. 28 1 3.11. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 2 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support 3 staffs). 4 3.12. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 5 Material in this Action. 6 3.13. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 7 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, 8 and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 9 subcontractors. 10 3.14. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 11 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 3.15. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from 13 a Producing Party. 14 4. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 16 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 17 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) 18 any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal 19 Protected Material. 20 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge 21 and other applicable authorities. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material 22 at trial. 23 5. DURATION 24 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as CONFIDENTIAL 25 or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial 26 becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including 27 the press, unless the Court has granted a motion to seal such material. See Kamakana v. City 28 and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good 1 cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” 2 standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms 3 of this protective order do not extend to any Protected Material used as an exhibit at trial or 4 hearing if the Court has either rejected or granted the request to seal such Protected Material. 5 If the Court has granted the request to seal such Protected Material, the terms of the order 6 sealing such material or the Local Rules govern the subsequent use and dissemination of 7 such material. 8 6. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 9 6.1. Each Party’s Requirement of Due Care. All Parties acknowledge that 10 discovery in this Action may involve documents and information that contain trade secrets 11 of one or more of the Parties or other Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friends of Hope Valley v. Frederick Co.
268 F.R.D. 643 (E.D. California, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MAJCO LLC v. JACKSON TIRE SERVICE, a California corporation; PHILLIP BOVERO, an individual, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/majco-llc-v-jackson-tire-service-a-california-corporation-phillip-caed-2025.