Maize v. Godman

7 Ind. 635
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ind. 635 (Maize v. Godman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maize v. Godman, 7 Ind. 635 (Ind. 1856).

Opinion

Stuart, J.

Maize applied to be discharged from arrest upon a- conviction for retailing in violation of the liquor law of 1853. He was remanded, and from that decision appeals to this Court. Godman is the jailer having him in custody.

The case involves the- questions decided in Maize v. The State, 4 Ind. R. 342. Upon careful review of that decision, with all the additional light since obtained, we are still satisfied with the ruling as a correct exposition of the constitution.

W. F. Lane., for the appellant. L. Reilly, for the appellee.

For the reasons there given, the judgment in this ease must be affirmed.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ind. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maize-v-godman-ind-1856.